Can the part be picked reliably?
There is a usable contact point and a practical way to present the part at the same point in the sequence.
The gripper or process tool is selected from the part and the task, not from the robot alone. This guide shows the information that decides how a robot can pick, hold, place, process, or hand off a part.
The practical question is not “which gripper?” but “what must the system do with this part at each point in the process?”
A good selection method establishes whether the complete handling sequence is practical, including the exceptions that happen during normal production.
There is a usable contact point and a practical way to present the part at the same point in the sequence.
The part, fixture, machine, and surrounding equipment leave enough access for the tool to pick, place, or process without creating a new obstruction.
The workflow defines what happens when a part is missing, misoriented, changed, or not released as expected.
If a person relies on judgement to find or orient every incoming part, the presentation method may need attention before a robot tool can be specified.
If the part has no consistent accessible contact area, determine how it can be located or presented before selecting a tool.
If variants look similar but need different handling, define how they are separated, identified, or changed over in the workflow.
If a missed pick, part release, or unsuitable part has no planned response, map the exception path before finalising the cell.
These applications use a gripper or process tool as part of the production workflow.
These answers explain why a robot cell is specified around the part and workflow—not only the arm.
End-of-arm tooling is the gripper, process tool, sensor, or other equipment mounted at the robot wrist to handle a part or carry out a task. It is selected as part of the complete application.
The tool follows the part's condition, pick point, orientation, surface, variation, access, process constraints, hand-off, and the way the complete system operates.
Not always. A tooling review must establish which variations need to be handled, where they can be picked, how they are identified, and what changeover or adjustment is practical.
The tool affects reach, access, part presentation, fixtures, sensors, hand-off, controls, and the overall system assessment. Selecting it alongside the workflow prevents a robot-only decision.
This guide helps frame a tooling discussion. It does not certify a gripper, set payload limits, or promise handling reliability for a specific part.
Confirm the part, tool, process conditions, system safeguards, and test method with Uru Robotics before treating this guide as a recommendation.
Add approved part and tooling examples only when they describe the actual application and its operating conditions.
Use your production figures to explore a simple planning estimate.
Discuss the part-handling task you want to automate.